Cyberpolitics Dalam Aktivisme Politik Digital Untuk Menjangkau Partisipasi Publik
Keywords:
politik, siber politik, aktivisme digitalAbstract
The transformation of the digital era has brought changes to the study of political science into the cyber realm. The pace of information and technology development has also brought changes to the socio-political behavior of society. Political activism also transformed into a virtual form. Public space which is a medium for conveying forms of demonstrations or political participation is now experiencing a change to cyber space. Political cyber becomes a new perspective in the form of democracy. Social interactions, political activities, political participation, and political campaigns are considered to be more effective in reaching audiences. The purpose of this study is to understand the phenomenon of activism and public participation in cyberpolitics. Political activism such as group action (collectivized collective action) and individualized collective action, or what is known as consensus mobilization is now shifting to cyber space. Deeper than that, cyberpolitics can be said to be a cloning of real political and democratic life in which every individual has a sense of equal rights so that whatever is in the mind, political image, or feelings of dissatisfaction with the government's performance can be expressed in cyber space. In conclusion, in this study the researcher explains and answers from a political perspective how modernization produces technological advances which are followed by social and political changes in society, so that in the future cyberpolitics will become a new treasure of interest to study.
Downloads
References
Bickford, S. (2011). Emotion Talk and Political Judgment. The Journal of Politics, 73(4), 1025–1037.
Bosch, T. (2016). Twitter activism and youth in South Africa: the case of #RhodesMustFall. Information, Communication & Society, 20(2), 221–232.
Breuer, A. and Welp, Y. (2014). Digital Technologies for Democratic Governance in Latin America. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
Chon, M. G., & Park, H. (2020). Social media activism in the digital age: Testing an integrative model of activism on contentious issues. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(1), 72– 97.
Choucri, N. (2012). Cyberpolitics in International Relations. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Dantes, N. (2012). Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: C.V ANDI OFFSET.
Zahira, D. Memetakan Aliran Aktivisme Digital. Center for Digital Society.
Fast Metrics (2017). Internet Speeds by Country - Fastest Internet In The World Map. [daring] Fastmetrics.com. Tersedia di: https://www.fastmetrics.com/internet-connection-speed-by-country.php#top-10-comparison-2017 [Diakses pada 31 Des. 2022].
Freedomhouse.org. Tersedia di: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2016/southkorea [Diakses pada 31 Des. 2022].
Ganesh, M. I. (2016). The New Green: The Landscapes of Digital Activism. Arrow for Change, 22(1), 2–6.
Nawawi, H. (1997). Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Indrawan, J. (2019). Cyberpolitics sebagai Perspektif Baru Memahami Politik di Era Siber. Jurnal Politica, 10(1).
Joyce, M. (Ed.). (2010a). Digital activism decoded: the new mechanics of change. New York: International Debate Education Association.
Joyce, M. (2010b). Introduction: how to think about digital activism. In M. Joyce (Ed.), Digital Activism Decoded: The New Mechanics of Change. New York, NY: International Debate Education Association.
Kang, J. (2017a). Igniting the Internet: Youth and Activism in Postauthoritarian South Korea. 1st ed. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Kang, J. (2017b). Internet Activism Transforming Street Politics: South Korea’s 2008 ‘Mad Cow’ Protests and New Democratic Sensibilities. Media, Culture & Society, 39(5), pp.750–761
Kompas, Riset Ungkap Lebih dari Separuh Penduduk Indonesia "Melek" Media Sosial, diakses pada 5 November 2022, https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2021/02/24/08050027/riset-ungkap-lebih-dari-separuh-penduduk-indonesia-melek-media-sosial
Lim, M. (2013). Many clicks but little sticks: social media activism in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(4), 636–657.
LP3ES, Ruang Aktivisme Digital dan Gerakan Sosial, diakses pada 1 Januari 2023,https://www.lp3es.or.id/2022/08/23/ruang-aktivisme-digital-dan-gerakan-sosial/
Micheletti, M. Discursive political consumerism and political participation. Ecpr.Eu. https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProp osal/faea2793-53be-4573-9b88- 778a5eeda26b.pdf
Moeti, K. (2017). Digital Activism Comes of Age: Technology is Creating New Space for Marginalized Voices. [daring] Hu¬ington Post. Tersedia di: https://www.hu-ingtonpost.com/entry/digital-activism-comes-of-age-technology-is-creating-us-590b498ae4b046ea176ae884 [Diakses pada 31 Dec. 2022].
Morozov, E. (2012). The Net Delusion. 2nd ed. London: Penguin.
Smith, M. (2015). Research Handbook on International Law and Cyberspace. Massachusetts: Edwar Elgar Publishing Limited.
Statista (2016). Topic: Internet Usage in Brazil. [daring] www.statista.com. Tersedia di: https://www.statista.com/topics/2045/internet-usage-in-brazil/ [Diakses pada 31 Des. 2022].
Wasserman, H. (2011). Mobile Phones, Popular Media, and Everyday African Democracy: Transmissions and Transgressions. Popular Communication, 9(2), 146–158.
